Last updated 29 October 2026

Anduril vs General Atomics

One aircraft class, two production contracts: the FQ-44A Fury and the FQ-42A, the first Collaborative Combat Aircraft the US Air Force will buy in volume.

On 17 June 2026 the US Air Force announced that General Atomics and Anduril had each received production contracts for Increment 1 of the Collaborative Combat Aircraft programme. Defense Scoop reported that the contracts cover the first three lots and are meant to let the service field at least 150 systems by the end of the decade. General Atomics builds the FQ-42A, which the Defense Scoop report calls Dark Merlin; on 14 September 2026 the Air Force named it Vengeance, according to Defense News. Anduril builds the FQ-44A, known as Fury. The Air Force's programme executive said that "at their core, they are built fundamentally as the same aircraft". This page therefore compares the two companies behind the airframes as well as the aircraft: a private group founded in 1955 and a private company valued at $61 billion.

Side By Side

Anduril IndustriesGeneral Atomics
CCA designationFQ-44A (Fury)FQ-42A (Vengeance; called Dark Merlin in the June 2026 Defense Scoop report)
Increment 1 awardProduction contract announced by the Air Force, 17 June 2026Production contract announced by the Air Force, 17 June 2026
Corporate formPrivate; $61 billion valuation after a $5 billion round led by Thrive Capital and Andreessen HorowitzPrivate defense and diversified technologies company; founded 1955 as a General Dynamics division, owned by the Blue family since 1986
2025 revenue$2.2 billion for 2025, as reported by DroneXLNot disclosed in the sources reviewed
ScaleNot stated in the sources reviewedMore than 14,000 employees across the General Atomics group
Design lineageFury began flying in October on Anduril's own autonomous flight softwareBased on the company's XQ-67A drone; first prototype flight in August 2025
ProductionFury production started at Arsenal-1 in Ohio, four months ahead of scheduleGA-ASI president: manufacturing is already well underway
Test setbackNo comparable incident in the sources reviewedYFQ-42A crashed after takeoff on 6 April 2026; no injuries; flying resumed about a month later
Mission autonomyOne of three vendors (with Shield AI and Collins Aerospace) in the next phase of the Increment 1 autonomy programmeBegan working with Collins Aerospace to retrofit a government-owned autonomy reference architecture; not among the three vendors named for the next phase

STAY ON TOP OF THIS MARKET

Track Anduril Industries and General Atomics with the weekly Signal Dossier.

One free weekly briefing on the signals that matter in the autonomous-systems sector: contract awards, capital flows, regulatory shifts, and what they change. Evaluating a specific company? A five-day, source-traced Decision Brief answers one decision question for £999.

ONE AIRCRAFT CLASS, TWO CONTRACTORS

The Air Force did not pick a winner and bought from both. Defense Scoop reported that the two companies beat at least three other vendors and that the contracts came four months ahead of schedule. Col. Timothy Helfrich, the programme acquisition executive, said the delivered aircraft will have roughly the same designs as their prototype versions. Of the two designations, FQ-42A and FQ-44A, he said "at their core, they are built fundamentally as the same aircraft".

Other companies will have the chance to compete for the follow-on Increment 2 platform, according to the same report. For now the Increment 1 field is two firms. Our assessment: the programme executive's description points to similar airframes, so the Increment 1 outcome may turn more on delivery, supplier risk and the software that flies on the aircraft than on the airframe itself.

TEST RECORD AND PRODUCTION

General Atomics had the visible setback. Defense One reported that one of its YFQ-42A aircraft experienced a mishap after takeoff at a company-owned airport in California on 6 April 2026, that no one was injured, and that flight testing was paused. Defense Scoop later reported that the drone resumed flying roughly a month after the accident, which General Atomics attributed to "an autopilot miscalculation for the weight and center of gravity of the aircraft, prompting a software remediation". Helfrich said the crash did not influence the production award. In a statement carried by Evertiq on 22 July 2026, GA-ASI president David R. Alexander said manufacturing was "already well underway".

Anduril's Fury began flying in October using the company's own autonomous flight software, according to Defense Scoop, and DroneXL reported that Fury production started at Arsenal-1 in Ohio four months ahead of schedule. No comparable test incident for Fury appears in the sources reviewed, which describes the sources and is not a clean bill of health.

TWO DIFFERENT COMPANIES

General Atomics describes itself as a defense and diversified technologies company founded in 1955 as a division of General Dynamics and acquired by the Blue family in 1986. Its website puts its employees at more than 14,000 and its facilities at more than 8 million square feet. Anduril is the venture-funded counterpart: DroneXL reported that it doubled its valuation to $61 billion in a $5 billion round led by Thrive Capital and Andreessen Horowitz, and reported 2025 revenue of $2.2 billion.

The two companies take different positions in the autonomy competition. Anduril, Shield AI and Collins Aerospace were selected for the next phase of the Increment 1 mission-autonomy programme, with a primary provider due in 2027. Shield AI says it is flight testing its Hivemind software aboard the Anduril YFQ-44A. General Atomics worked with Collins Aerospace on a government-owned autonomy reference architecture for the FQ-42A. Our assessment: Anduril is positioned to own both the airframe and a leading autonomy candidate, while General Atomics is positioned as an airframe maker whose software could come from the government's chosen provider. The 2027 selection is the date that tests that reading.

When To Choose

Choose Anduril Industries if:

  • Preference for one contractor that develops its own autonomous flight software alongside the airframe
  • Interest in a newer entrant with its own production site at Arsenal-1 in Ohio
  • Exposure to a company in the next phase of the Increment 1 mission-autonomy programme

Choose General Atomics if:

  • Preference for a long-established aircraft maker with a diversified group of more than 14,000 employees behind it
  • A modular airframe that GA-ASI says allows rapid integration of mission systems and autonomy software
  • A test setback that has been publicly explained and remediated, with the Air Force stating it did not affect the award

Full Profiles

TRACK Anduril Industries and General Atomics

New contract awards, funding rounds, and regulatory shifts affecting Anduril Industries and General Atomics, tracked and summarised for you. Free, one email a week, no other sends.

TRACK Anduril Industries and General Atomics

New contract awards, funding rounds, and regulatory shifts affecting Anduril Industries and General Atomics, tracked and summarised for you. Free, one email a week, no other sends.

Weighing Anduril Industries against General Atomics for a live decision? Commission a Decision Brief: an independent three-page read on either company, delivered in five working days.

Related Comparisons

Drone Intelligence, Comparison. Compiled from public filings, company disclosures and specialist reporting. Last updated 29 October 2026.

info@droneintelligence.ai