On 17 June 2026 the US Air Force announced that General Atomics and Anduril had each received production contracts for Increment 1 of the Collaborative Combat Aircraft programme. Defense Scoop reported that the contracts cover the first three lots and are meant to let the service field at least 150 systems by the end of the decade. General Atomics builds the FQ-42A, which the Defense Scoop report calls Dark Merlin; on 14 September 2026 the Air Force named it Vengeance, according to Defense News. Anduril builds the FQ-44A, known as Fury. The Air Force's programme executive said that "at their core, they are built fundamentally as the same aircraft". This page therefore compares the two companies behind the airframes as well as the aircraft: a private group founded in 1955 and a private company valued at $61 billion.
Side By Side
| Anduril Industries | General Atomics | |
|---|---|---|
| CCA designation | FQ-44A (Fury) | FQ-42A (Vengeance; called Dark Merlin in the June 2026 Defense Scoop report) |
| Increment 1 award | Production contract announced by the Air Force, 17 June 2026 | Production contract announced by the Air Force, 17 June 2026 |
| Corporate form | Private; $61 billion valuation after a $5 billion round led by Thrive Capital and Andreessen Horowitz | Private defense and diversified technologies company; founded 1955 as a General Dynamics division, owned by the Blue family since 1986 |
| 2025 revenue | $2.2 billion for 2025, as reported by DroneXL | Not disclosed in the sources reviewed |
| Scale | Not stated in the sources reviewed | More than 14,000 employees across the General Atomics group |
| Design lineage | Fury began flying in October on Anduril's own autonomous flight software | Based on the company's XQ-67A drone; first prototype flight in August 2025 |
| Production | Fury production started at Arsenal-1 in Ohio, four months ahead of schedule | GA-ASI president: manufacturing is already well underway |
| Test setback | No comparable incident in the sources reviewed | YFQ-42A crashed after takeoff on 6 April 2026; no injuries; flying resumed about a month later |
| Mission autonomy | One of three vendors (with Shield AI and Collins Aerospace) in the next phase of the Increment 1 autonomy programme | Began working with Collins Aerospace to retrofit a government-owned autonomy reference architecture; not among the three vendors named for the next phase |
STAY ON TOP OF THIS MARKET
Track Anduril Industries and General Atomics with the weekly Signal Dossier.
One free weekly briefing on the signals that matter in the autonomous-systems sector: contract awards, capital flows, regulatory shifts, and what they change. Evaluating a specific company? A five-day, source-traced Decision Brief answers one decision question for £999.
ONE AIRCRAFT CLASS, TWO CONTRACTORS
The Air Force did not pick a winner and bought from both. Defense Scoop reported that the two companies beat at least three other vendors and that the contracts came four months ahead of schedule. Col. Timothy Helfrich, the programme acquisition executive, said the delivered aircraft will have roughly the same designs as their prototype versions. Of the two designations, FQ-42A and FQ-44A, he said "at their core, they are built fundamentally as the same aircraft".
Other companies will have the chance to compete for the follow-on Increment 2 platform, according to the same report. For now the Increment 1 field is two firms. Our assessment: the programme executive's description points to similar airframes, so the Increment 1 outcome may turn more on delivery, supplier risk and the software that flies on the aircraft than on the airframe itself.
TEST RECORD AND PRODUCTION
General Atomics had the visible setback. Defense One reported that one of its YFQ-42A aircraft experienced a mishap after takeoff at a company-owned airport in California on 6 April 2026, that no one was injured, and that flight testing was paused. Defense Scoop later reported that the drone resumed flying roughly a month after the accident, which General Atomics attributed to "an autopilot miscalculation for the weight and center of gravity of the aircraft, prompting a software remediation". Helfrich said the crash did not influence the production award. In a statement carried by Evertiq on 22 July 2026, GA-ASI president David R. Alexander said manufacturing was "already well underway".
Anduril's Fury began flying in October using the company's own autonomous flight software, according to Defense Scoop, and DroneXL reported that Fury production started at Arsenal-1 in Ohio four months ahead of schedule. No comparable test incident for Fury appears in the sources reviewed, which describes the sources and is not a clean bill of health.
TWO DIFFERENT COMPANIES
General Atomics describes itself as a defense and diversified technologies company founded in 1955 as a division of General Dynamics and acquired by the Blue family in 1986. Its website puts its employees at more than 14,000 and its facilities at more than 8 million square feet. Anduril is the venture-funded counterpart: DroneXL reported that it doubled its valuation to $61 billion in a $5 billion round led by Thrive Capital and Andreessen Horowitz, and reported 2025 revenue of $2.2 billion.
The two companies take different positions in the autonomy competition. Anduril, Shield AI and Collins Aerospace were selected for the next phase of the Increment 1 mission-autonomy programme, with a primary provider due in 2027. Shield AI says it is flight testing its Hivemind software aboard the Anduril YFQ-44A. General Atomics worked with Collins Aerospace on a government-owned autonomy reference architecture for the FQ-42A. Our assessment: Anduril is positioned to own both the airframe and a leading autonomy candidate, while General Atomics is positioned as an airframe maker whose software could come from the government's chosen provider. The 2027 selection is the date that tests that reading.
When To Choose
Choose Anduril Industries if:
- Preference for one contractor that develops its own autonomous flight software alongside the airframe
- Interest in a newer entrant with its own production site at Arsenal-1 in Ohio
- Exposure to a company in the next phase of the Increment 1 mission-autonomy programme
Choose General Atomics if:
- Preference for a long-established aircraft maker with a diversified group of more than 14,000 employees behind it
- A modular airframe that GA-ASI says allows rapid integration of mission systems and autonomy software
- A test setback that has been publicly explained and remediated, with the Air Force stating it did not affect the award
Full Profiles
Anduril Industries
Costa Mesa, California, USA · Private
Defence technology company building autonomous platforms and the Lattice AI command-and-control platform. The most heavily capitalised non-traditional defence firm in the US.
View profile →General Atomics
California, USA · Private
Privately held defence group whose aeronautical arm, GA-ASI, makes the MQ-9 family and the FQ-42A Collaborative Combat Aircraft now in US Air Force production.
View profile →Sources & References
- DefenseScoop, Air Force picks Anduril, General Atomics to build first operational CCA drones (17 June 2026)
- Defense One, General Atomics pauses drone wingman flight tests after crash (6 April 2026)
- General Atomics, About
- DroneXL, Anduril chases $100 billion valuation eight weeks after doubling to $61 billion (24 July 2026)
- Evertiq, US Air Force awards GA-ASI production contract for FQ-42A CCA (22 July 2026)
- Shield AI, Series G and Aechelon acquisition (26 March 2026)
- Defense News, Vengeance and Fury: US Air Force names new CCAs (14 September 2026)
Weighing Anduril Industries against General Atomics for a live decision? Commission a Decision Brief: an independent three-page read on either company, delivered in five working days.
Related Comparisons
Anduril vs Palantir
Two Silicon Valley defence insurgents that meet at the software layer: a vertically integrated hardware and autonomy company against a pure software and data-analytics platform.
Kratos vs Anduril
The two leading names in uncrewed combat aircraft took opposite paths through the CCA programme: the public attritable-jet pioneer against the private software-defined challenger.
Auterion vs Anduril
Two approaches to defence autonomy software, a vendor-agnostic operating system versus a vertically integrated command-and-control platform.
Skydio vs Anduril
Two private US defence-autonomy leaders operating at very different scales, an autonomous drone manufacturer and a defence-systems platform.
Anduril vs Shield AI
Two of the most heavily capitalised non-traditional US defence-tech companies. Different layers of the autonomous warfare stack.
AeroVironment vs Anduril
A 50-year-old publicly traded defence prime vs the most heavily capitalised non-traditional defence-tech compounder of the past decade.
Drone Intelligence, Comparison. Compiled from public filings, company disclosures and specialist reporting. Last updated 29 October 2026.
info@droneintelligence.ai