Last updated 15 June 2026

DroneShield vs Fortem Technologies

Two leading US-aligned counter-UAS specialists with opposite defeat philosophies: electronic-warfare RF defeat versus radar-cued kinetic interception.

DroneShield and Fortem Technologies are both front-rank counter-UAS suppliers to US and allied forces, but they solve the defeat problem with opposite physics. DroneShield is an ASX-listed pure-play built on AI radio-frequency detection and electronic-warfare jamming, with 2025 revenue near AU$216.5 million and a pipeline above AU$2.55 billion. Fortem is a private, Lockheed Martin-backed company that pairs its TrueView radar with the DroneHunter autonomous interceptor to physically capture targets, and is now a directly authorised US Army counter-drone supplier. One disrupts the drone's control link; the other flies out and catches the drone.

Side By Side

DroneShieldFortem Technologies
Founded20142016
HeadquartersSydney, Australia (with Virginia, USA operations)Lindon, Utah, USA
StatusPublic (ASX: DRO)Private (Lockheed Martin strategic investor)
Primary Defeat MethodAI RF detection and electronic-warfare jammingRadar detection (TrueView) plus autonomous kinetic interceptor (DroneHunter)
Operational OutcomeDisrupts the command link; target returns home, hovers, or descendsPhysically intercepts and captures the target drone via net
Flagship ProductsDroneSentry-X, DroneGun Mk4, DroneCannonTrueView radar, DroneHunter F700, SkyDome
Effect Against Preprogrammed Attack DronesRF defeat is strongest against C2-linked commercial dronesDroneHunter F700 publicly confirmed against the Shahed-136 (Group-3)
Scale Signal2025 revenue AU$216.5M; pipeline AU$2.55B+ across 300+ projects$18M three-year US Army contract (Feb 2026); US Army direct-sale authorisation
Capital PositionASX-listed; AU$235.2M cash, no debt$79.3M pre-Series B plus Lockheed Martin $25M Series B tranche (Apr 2026)
NDAA / Federal ProcurementCompliantCompliant (sole-source authorised)

JAMMING VS KINETIC INTERCEPTION

DroneShield's electronic-warfare approach disrupts the radio link between a drone and its operator, after which the target executes its fail-safe behaviour: return home, hover, or descend. It is fast to deploy, hardware-mature, and effective across the commercial drones that dominate most threat environments, which is reflected in DroneShield's roughly four-fold revenue growth into 2025. The structural limit is that link disruption does little against a drone that is not relying on a live link.

Fortem addresses exactly that gap. The DroneHunter F700 is radar-cued by TrueView and flies out to net-capture its target, with public confirmation of capability against the Shahed-136, the preprogrammed one-way attack drone that flies a fixed GPS route and ignores command-link jamming. The trade is that kinetic interception is a discrete, per-target engagement rather than an area effect, so throughput against saturating raids depends on interceptor inventory and reload. In practice the two are increasingly layered: RF defeat for the commercial-drone baseline, kinetic interception for the attack-drone profiles that jamming cannot reach.

PROCUREMENT AND CAPITAL POSTURE

DroneShield's ASX listing gives buyers revenue, pipeline, and balance-sheet visibility that private vendors cannot match, plus a broad international order book spanning NATO, US federal, and Indo-Pacific customers. For procurement teams that value a financially transparent pure-play with proven manufacturing throughput, that is a meaningful advantage.

Fortem's posture is defined by its prime relationship. Lockheed Martin's April 2026 $25 million Series B tranche converts a strategic partnership into venture capital and signals that the largest US defence prime views Fortem's integrated detect-and-defeat stack as integration-grade for its own air-defence portfolios. Combined with the November 2025 US Army direct-sale authorisation and the February 2026 $18 million Army contract, Fortem is aligned to US military counter-UAS procurement in a way a listed Australian pure-play is not.

When To Choose

Choose DroneShield if:

  • Broad RF defeat against C2-linked commercial drone populations
  • Fixed-site, maritime, and tactical deployments needing mature, fast-to-field hardware
  • Procurement preference for a listed pure-play with revenue visibility and a large international pipeline

Choose Fortem Technologies if:

  • Defeat of preprogrammed one-way attack drones (Shahed-class) that ignore link jamming
  • Need for physical capture with low radio-frequency collateral
  • US Army procurement alignment and Lockheed Martin integration in one radar-plus-interceptor stack

Full Profiles

Drone Intelligence, Comparison. Compiled from public filings, primary sources, and verified disclosures. Last updated 15 June 2026.

paul@droneintelligence.ai